Автор блога insufferable.dev разобрал изменения тарифов Codex, ИИ-помощника для работы с кодом, и жалобы на медленную работу GPT-6.1 Sol. По его мнению, OpenAI предпочитает будущие доходы от массовой аудитории нынешним платежам пользователей Codex.

Автор объясняет этот выбор конкуренцией с Muse, ИИ-помощником Meta. OpenAI сообщила об изменении лимитов в Pro 200 при прежней цене $200 в месяц и о новом тарифе Pro 500 за $500 в месяц.

Автор сам пользуется Codex и пока не собирается отказываться от подписки, хотя прогнозирует дальнейшее ухудшение условий.

Проверка утверждений:

  • Автор блога insufferable.dev считает, что OpenAI предпочитает будущие доходы от массовой аудитории нынешним платежам пользователей Codex. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «And that’s the reason for the second-rate treatment the Codex and Work users get. As far as OpenAI is concerned, the potential for high future revenue from free users is preferred to actual real revenue from Codex users.»)
  • Автор разобрал изменения тарифов Codex и жалобы на медленную работу GPT-6.1 Sol. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «And just to rub salt in the wounds, a new $500 plan was announced that has 25x usage compared with the Plus plan . So, more than double the price for almost the same usage. And the “Dev” Day continued to release feature after feature that was irrelevant to devs and Codex users in general. A new model was announced: GPT-6.1 Sol , which they clearly wanted to release as Astra Minor, but their hand got pushed by how good Opus 5.5 was at both usage and quality levels. The “Dots” feature , which was released with a lot of fanfare, turned out to be a dud as well. It was so undercooked and badly designed that users struggled to understand what its USP was compared with regular ChatGPT chat. The new 6.1 ‘Slo’ model The new model, while clearly as efficient usage-wise and almost the same quality as Opus/Astra, ran slower than molasses . Users reported as high as 2 minutes to first token, 4-minute compactions (when they didn’t time out), and 20 tokens/second throughput, which is lower than local models running on weak GPUs with some of the workload offloaded to RAM.»)
  • Автор объясняет приоритет массовой аудитории конкуренцией с приложением Muse от Meta. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «So this whole Muse thingy taking off is a big spanner in the works for them. So they needed to strengthen their offering on the consumer side with Dots. Even though it is not available to free users at the moment (or even Plus users), it is clearly going to be once the product stabilizes and they find enough compute. And that’s the reason for the second-rate treatment the Codex and Work users get. As far as OpenAI is concerned, the potential for high future revenue from free users is preferred to actual real revenue from Codex users.»)
  • OpenAI сообщила об изменении лимитов в Pro 200 при прежней цене $200 в месяц. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «Pro 200 subscriptions Pro 200 is available for new subscriptions again at $200/month. Included usage allowances are changing. Users affected by these changes will receive an email with additional details. The monthly price remains $200.»)
  • OpenAI объявила новый тариф Pro 500 за $500 в месяц. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «We’re introducing Pro 500, a new $500/month plan with the highest included usage of the Pro plans and access to Astra Ultrafast in ChatGPT Work and Codex.»)
  • Автор сам пользуется Codex и пока не собирается отказываться от подписки, хотя прогнозирует дальнейшее ухудшение условий. (подтверждено самой публикацией: доказательство; «As you probably noticed from my previous posts ( A Tale of Two Coding Subscriptions ), I’m a big fan of Codex and a current user. My prediction is that the Codex subscription is going to get more enshittified over time, and this is just the start. Does that mean I’m jumping ship? Sadly, no.»)

Публикации:

оценка 57,4 из 100 · тип: разбор